data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdfb5/fdfb512b18de79c3ced16d414a027d3a00e91d8d" alt=""
Trump’s 10 Percent Tariffs: Projected Impacts on U.S ... - AAF
2024年6月25日 · New tariffs could increase household costs by as much as $2,350 annually if tariffs are fully passed on to consumers, resulting in a 3 percent decrease in income for the median earner. If a specialized 60 percent tariff were levied against China, costs would likely increase by $3,900, an effective income loss of 5 percent for the median-income ...
The New Foreign Pollution Fee Act - AAF
2025年1月29日 · The new proposal would levy variable tariffs on certain covered goods – aluminum, cement, iron and steel, fertilizer, glass, and hydrogen – imported into the United States. The tariffs consist of a base rate of 15 percent and an additional rate based on the difference in carbon intensity between domestic and foreign goods.
The Total Cost of U.S. Tariffs - AAF
2022年5月10日 · The tariffs have significantly affected U.S. trade levels. Research has found that the tariffs caused importers to shift away from China and reorganize supply chains. What’s more, the president’s tariffs have decreased trade altogether – both imports and exports – which raises prices and reduces options for both U.S. consumers and ...
Trump’s Proposed 10 Percent Tariff: Considering the Impact
2023年11月28日 · If the United States were to impose a new 10 percent tariff on all goods, our trading partners would more than likely impose their own retaliatory tariffs on goods imported from the United States. When President Trump originally imposed his tranches of Section 301 and 232 tariffs, countries including but not limited to China, Japan, India, and ...
Biden’s Protectionist Agenda - AAF
2024年7月10日 · Biden has not shied away from instituting new trade barriers, raising tariffs in May 2024 on $18 billion worth of Chinese goods. This was advertised as a strategic move to protect U.S. interests and promote fair competition in key sectors such as clean technology, semiconductors, and critical minerals. [8]
Post Inauguration Edition: Presidential Actions and Trade Reaction
2025年1月23日 · It may also signal the administration’s intention to “correct” U.S. trade deficits and induce domestic manufacturing via USTR investigations that allow for new tariffs in a few months. Evidence for this approach is that China may also be hit with new U.S. tariffs , which are not paired with any clear negotiating objective, on February 1.
New Podcast Episode: The Economy, the BioSecure Act, and New …
2024年5月23日 · It’s The AAF Exchange — your source for clear, data-driven insight into today’s economic and domestic policy issues. In this episode of the AAF Exchange, AAF President Douglas Holtz-Eakin discusses warning signs for the economy, the BioSecure Act’s proposed China decoupling, and more tariffs on the horizon. AAF …
the new same level of utility as before the tariffs, U.S. consumer income would have to decrease by $123.3 billion. 1 In response to the Section 301 tariffs, China matched the rates and volume of products affected in each tranche of tariffs to mirror the incidence of the tariffs as retaliation.
Tariff Reciprocity…Unless It’s Steel or Aluminum - AAF
6 天之前 · These new tariffs differ, however, in that they raise the tariff rate on aluminum from the previous 10 percent and both steel and aluminum imports will face tariffs no matter the country of origin, meaning that exemptions for Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, Australia, the European Union, Japan, and the United Kingdom are no ...
The Cost of Reciprocal Trade - AAF
2019年2月4日 · Tariffs increase costs for both American producers and consumers. This analysis finds that imposing a new reciprocal trade policy through equal tariffs on our current trade partners could increase nationwide prices by over $60 billion per year, not counting the cost of retaliation. Reciprocal tariffs would be a significant blow to the U.S. economy.