Thomson Reuters scores early win in AI copyright battles in the US - Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over ...

When the Writers Guild of America approved a contract with major studios in 2023, ending a 148-day strike, the union became ...

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under ...

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann on Tuesday warned that under President Donald Trump “it’s a great time to be a corporate criminal” in America ― and also to be a foreign adversary.

The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...

In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.

An international law firm has blocked general access to several artificial intelligence (AI) tools after it found a ...

On the most basic level, artists who may not earn much or any of their income from the sale of their artistic output need to prove to the IRS that they are professionals and not just dilettantes.

An AI company lifted material from Thomson Reuters' research platform, arguing fair use and innocent infringement. A court has ruled it was copyright violation.

The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.

MAGA American among us must admit: Donald Trump holds sway over our times. Having dominated our politics for eight years, and installed to dominate it for four more, he is on a course to change ...

In Tries v. Cricones, home buyers prevailed at trial on their claims against home developers and sellers. Plaintiffs sued ...