A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright ...

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...

An exception within the U.S. copyright law that allows excerpts from copyrighted ... For example, a paragraph excerpted from a book would be considered fair use as long as the original work ...

Thomson Reuters has won a major copyright victory as a judge ruled that a competitor using its work to train an AI tool was not fair use.

The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rightsholders.

Dan Cahoy, a Professor of Business Law at Penn State’s Smeal College of Business, states, "Ultimately, there are four broad and somewhat amorphous factors to determine fair use: the purpose and ...

Some artificial intelligence companies have argued the fair use doctrine in intellectual property law allows them to train generative AI models on news content and other copyrighted material.